Comments on: inSL document oddness http://signpostmarv.name/2008/03/24/insl-document-oddness/ Thoughts of a Geek & SL Resident Wed, 19 May 2010 14:17:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Dedric Mauriac http://signpostmarv.name/2008/03/24/insl-document-oddness/comment-page-1/#comment-126 Dedric Mauriac Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:07:26 +0000 http://blog.signpostmarv.name/2008/03/24/insl-document-oddness/#comment-126 I am wondering about parodies. Doesn't copyright law allow you to modify trademarks to make fun of them? Look at http://getafirstlife.com/ for example. I am wondering if they really expect everyone to take the logo down after a year. That would be a bit crazy. Are we still allowed to use the original logo provided for fan sites? I don't recall all of this registration, confusion, and stringent rules about it. I am wondering about parodies. Doesn’t copyright law allow you to modify trademarks to make fun of them? Look at http://getafirstlife.com/ for example.

I am wondering if they really expect everyone to take the logo down after a year. That would be a bit crazy. Are we still allowed to use the original logo provided for fan sites? I don’t recall all of this registration, confusion, and stringent rules about it.

]]> By: Vint Falken http://signpostmarv.name/2008/03/24/insl-document-oddness/comment-page-1/#comment-127 Vint Falken Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:07:08 +0000 http://blog.signpostmarv.name/2008/03/24/insl-document-oddness/#comment-127 I wonder, did they not forget LSL­™ in their list? I wonder, did they not forget LSL­™ in their list?

]]>